Application of parallel computing in data mining for contaminant source identification in water distribution systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contaminant source identification (CSI) procedures are drawing increasing attention due to the possibility of accidental and/or deliberate contaminant intrusion into water distribution systems. However, uncertainties that exist in the modeling have the potential to dramatically impact the capabilities of CSI procedures. Nodal demand uncertainties, as they influence false negative and false positive rates of contaminant detection, are examined. A procedure to quantify the false negative rate is provided, and the false positive issue is shown to be related to a parameter ‘m’. Addressing the false positive and negative issues is demonstrated as feasible due to the use of parallel computing in a super-computer, which reduces the elapsed time for 150 scenario simulations from 37.5 hrs to only 15 min in the case study. By increasing the number of scenarios in the database for CSI through the use of a super-computer, the opportunity exists to decrease the false negative rate and reduce the number of false possible intrusion nodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".