MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132531458 · doi:10.1109/dexa.2000.875029

Requirements for holonic manufacturing systems control

2002· article· en· W2132531458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndustrial control systemControl systemDistributed control systemProcess controlComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Instrumentation and control engineeringSoftware architectureSoftwareEmbedded systemProcess (computing)Control (management)EngineeringControl engineeringSystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real time control of holonic manufacturing systems requires a radically different approach from that of traditional unit level regulatory control. Because they need to automatically adapt and reconfigure based on the ever changing requirements of the manufacturing system, control systems based on this approach are termed metamorphic control systems. The engineering of such software centric metamorphic control systems for dynamically reconfigurable distributed multi sensor based holonic systems is addressed. An integrated and uniform event driven control architecture is specified for various functional levels of metamorphic control system. This architecture utilizes the emerging International Electrotechnical Commission function block standard (IEC 1499) for industrial process measurement and control systems to specify the requisite behavior of distributed control software components (agents).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it