MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132575154 · doi:10.1109/tec.2005.858092

Power Quality Control of Wind-Hybrid Power Generation System Using Fuzzy-LQR Controller

2007· article· en· W2132575154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorController (irrigation)Fuzzy logicFuzzy control systemControl engineeringElectric power systemEngineeringAutomatic Generation ControlWind powerPower (physics)Computer scienceOptimal controlMathematicsControl (management)Mathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents modeling and control design of a wind-hybrid power system that includes a battery storage and a dumpload. The proposed control scheme is based on the Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy model and the linear quadratic regulator. The TS fuzzy model expresses the local dynamics of a nonlinear system partitioned into sub systems by linguistic rules. A possibility auto-regression model is presented that provides optimally partitioned sub systems based on the observed time series. The controllers for each sub system are designed by the linear quadratic regulator. In the simulation study, the proposed controller is compared with the conventional proportional-integral controller and shown to be more effective against disturbances caused by the wind speed and the load variations. Thus, a better power quality is achieved on the given site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it