MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132588792 · doi:10.1586/eem.11.97

Prostate cancer and androgenic alopecia

2012· article· en· W2132588792 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Yassa, Tarek Hijal, P. Giraud

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverdiagnosisMedicineProstate cancerCancerFinasterideProstateOncologyGynecologyObservational studyProstate-specific antigenMechanism (biology)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancer is a burden on society. Its prevalence can reach up to 80% in males aged 70 years and older. Current screening programs based on prostate-specific antigen testing lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment with uncertain benefits on survival. Androgenic alopecia is also highly prevalent in elderly males. Observational studies have found that androgenic alopecia is linked to prostate cancer, but studies have been conflictual. Further research should focus on finding the exact mechanism linking these two pathologies. This should help clinicians improve screening programs and guide research into novel molecules to help in the prevention and treatment of both androgenic alopecia and prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicHair Growth and DisordersFrench-language works237,207