MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2132589463 · doi:10.1109/hpcs.2007.15

Domain coupling in the ABC transporter system BtuCD/BtuF: molecular dynamics simulation, normal mode analysis and protein-protein docking

2007· article· en· W2132589463 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Kandt, E.O. Oloo, D. Peter Tieleman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsATP-binding cassette transporterMolecular dynamicsTransmembrane domainATP hydrolysisDocking (animal)Transmembrane proteinTransport proteinTransporterChemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryBiologyMembraneEnzymeComputational chemistryATPaseGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters form a large class of proteins that use energy from ATP to power transport across biological membranes against the thermodynamic gradient. They consist of two water-soluble domains that are responsible for ATP hydrolysis and two transmembrane domains that form the transport pathway. In addition, they often interact with auxiliary domains or proteins that may regulate the transport process or deliver substrates. Recent crystal structures have revealed the molecular architecture of ABC transporters. We are using a combination of computational techniques to study the dynamics of ABC transporters, the possible mechanism by which the energy of ATP hydrolysis is used for transport, and the interactions between the different domains. We present an overview of our current understanding of the interactions between the domains of the vitamin Bu importer BtuCD, new simulation results from the BtuCD protein, and two models of the interactions of BtuCD with its substrate binding protein BtuF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→