MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132597966 · doi:10.1002/masy.201050521

Theoretical Modelling of Hierarchically Associated Structures in Hydrophobically Modified PNIPAM Aqueous Solutions on the Basis of a Neutron Scattering Study

2010· article· en· W2132597966 on OpenAlexaff
Tsuyoshi Koga, Fumihiko Tanaka, Ryuhei Motokawa, Satoshi Koizumi, Françoise M. Winnik

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicelleAqueous solutionNeutron scatteringPolymerSmall-angle neutron scatteringScatteringPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringDynamic light scatteringShell (structure)ChemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryNanotechnologyNanoparticleComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We developed a theoretical model for a self‐assembling telechelic poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) carrying octadecyl end‐groups in aqueous solution, as a function of temperature and concentration, on the basis of small‐angle neutron scattering data. In solutions of concentration 10 g L−1 at temperatures between 10 and 20 °C, the telechelic PNIPAM of molecular weight of 22,200 g mol−1 associates in the form of flower micelles containing about 12 polymer chains. Micelles have a 3‐layered core‐shell morphology with an inner core consisting of the octadecyl units, a dense inner shell consisting of partly collapsed PNIPAM chains, and an outer shell of swollen hydrated PNIPAM chains. Drastic changes in the scattering profile of the solution heated above 31 °C are attributed to the formation of mesoglobules of diameter of 100 nm consisting of about 1000 polymer chains. In solutions of lower concentration (1 g L−1), association of flower micelles and mesoglobules is suppressed. The structure of the individual flower micelles and mesoglobules is not affected by changes in concentration. In solutions of 50 g L−1, a peak attributed to a correlation between flower micelles appears in the scattering profiles at low temperature (10 °C). Despite the difference in the population of intermicellar bridges, the overall temperature dependence of the scattering profile at 50 g L−1 remains similar to that at 10 g L−1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular SymposiaSame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207