Sex Disparities in Effects of Cystic Fibrosis‐Related Diabetes on Clinical Outcomes: A Matched Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is an increasingly prevalent comorbidity factor for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CFRD has been associated with an accelerated decline in clinical parameters and an increased mortality rate. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of CFRD on pulmonary function and clinical status using a matched study design to further explore potential causality. METHODS: Charts from the adult CF clinic at St Paul's Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia) were retrospectively reviewed. Forty CFRD patients with and without fasting hyperglycemia were matched to CF patients with nondiabetic glucose tolerance based on sex, age and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)). RESULTS: Sixteen of 40 CFRD patients (40%) died compared with nine of 40 patient controls (23%) (P=0.13). CFRD patients were more likely to experience declines in FEV(1) (P<0.01), especially women (P<0.01). Patients with CFRD were not more likely to be hospitalized (P=0.39). Body mass index did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CFRD had higher rates of FEV(1) deterioration than nondiabetic patients with CF, and showed a trend toward increased mortality. The present study suggests that CFRD has a significant clinical impact and should be carefully considered when evaluating the status of CF patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".