MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diseño de un Sistema para el Control de la Humedad Relativa y la Temperatura, de Acuerdo a los Índices de Confort en Incubación y Fructificación en una Unidad Productiva de Orellanas (Pleurotus Ostreatus Jacq. Kumm)

2015· article· es· W2132640111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINGENIARE · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and soil sciences
Canadian institutionsIron Ore Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo principal de este trabajo fue el de diseñar un sistema para mantener la humedad relativa y la temperatura, dentro de los índices de confort, en una unidad productiva de Orellanas, de la empresa Orellanas Con Sentido Social; esto, con la ayuda del grupo de investigación SIPAF, de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Según la teoría, los valores de %HR y temperatura en un invernadero de fructificación de Orellanas, deberían estar entre 85 y 95% y entre 15 y 20°C, respectivamente. De igual manera, para un cuarto de incubación, estos valores deberían ser de 60 a 75% y de 20 a 25°C, en promedio. En la empresa se presentaban valores por debajo de lo recomendado, con un tiempo de producción demasiado tardío para este cultivo. Por tal motivo, era necesario un análisis y una intervención en la situación

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it