Role of Parathyroid Hormone in the Downregulation of Liver Cytochrome P450 in Chronic Renal Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic renal failure (CRF) is associated with a decrease in drug metabolism secondary to a decrease in liver cytochrome P450 (P450). The predominant theory to explain this decrease is the presence of factors in the blood of uremic patients. This study tested the hypothesis that parathyroid hormone (PTH) could be this factor. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the role of PTH in the downregulation of hepatocyte P450 induced by rat uremic serum, (2) the role of PTH in the downregulation of liver P450 in rats with CRF, and (3) the effects of PTH on P450 in hepatocytes. For this purpose, (1) hepatocytes were incubated with serum from rat with CRF that was depleted with anti-PTH antibodies or with serum from parathyroidectomized (CRF-PTX) rat with CRF, (2) the effect of PTX on liver P450 was evaluated in rats with CRF, and (3) the effects of PTH on P450 in hepatocytes were determined. The depletion of PTH from CRF serum completely reversed the downregulating effect of CRF serum on P450 in hepatocytes. Addition of PTH (10(-9) M) to depleted CRF serum induced a decrease in P450 similar to nondepleted CRF serum. The serum of CRF-PTX rats had no effect on P450 in hepatocytes compared with CRF serum. Adding PTH to CRF-PTX serum induced a similar decrease in P450 as obtained with CRF serum. Finally, PTX prevented the decrease of liver P450 in rats with CRF. In summary, PTH is the major mediator implicated in the downregulation of liver P450 in rats with CRF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | medium |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".