Three‐dimensional CFD model for a flat plate photocatalytic reactor: Degradation of TCE in a serpentine flow field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was applied to a photocatalytic reactor with surface reaction for trichloroethylene (TCE) oxidation at various pollutant concentrations, and flow rates. First‐order and Langmuir‐Hinshelwood kinetics for TCE removal rate were considered. The results were compared with those from experiments of Demeestere et al. (Appl Catal B Environ. 2004;54:261–274) in a flat plate photocatalytic reactor with serpentine geometry. The flow regime was laminar. Through the CFD simulation, the velocity field and the concentration gradient of TCE in the reactor were studied in detail. At Reynolds numbers around 900, the laminar flow becomes unstable. Under such a condition, when flow passes the 180° sharp turns, due to formation of secondary flow and consequently vortices, there is a lot of cross‐sectional mixing in the reactor. This kind of studies can help us to model the photocatalytic reactor as accurately as possible. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".