FcγR-Mediated Phagocytosis Stimulates Localized Pinocytosis in Human Neutrophils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Engulfment of IgG-coated particles by neutrophils and macrophages is an essential component of the innate immune response. This process, known as phagocytosis, is triggered by clustering of FcgammaR at sites where leukocytes make contact with the opsonized particles. We found that phagocytosis is accompanied by a burst of fluid phase pinocytosis, which is largely restricted to the immediate vicinity of the phagosomal cup. FcgammaR-induced pinocytosis preceded and appeared to be independent of phagosomal sealing. Accordingly, fluid phase uptake was accentuated by actin depolymerization, which precludes phagocytosis. Stimulation of pinocytosis required phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity and was eliminated when changes in the cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration were prevented. Because stimulation of FcgammaR also induces secretion, which is similarly calcium and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase dependent, we studied the possible relationship between these events. Neutrophil fragments devoid of secretory granules (cytoplasts) were prepared by sedimentation through Ficoll gradients. Cytoplasts could perform FcgammaR-mediated phagocytosis, which was not accompanied by activation of pinocytosis. This observation suggests that granule exocytosis is required for stimulation of pinocytosis. Analysis of the cytosolic Ca(2+) dependence of secretion and pinocytosis suggests that primary (lysosomal) granule exocytosis is the main determinant of pinocytosis during FcgammaR stimulation. Importantly, primary granules are secreted in a polarized fashion near forming phagosomes. Focal pinocytosis during particle engulfment may contribute to Ag processing and presentation and/or to retrieval of components of the secretory machinery. Alternatively, it may represent an early event in the remodeling of the phagosomal membrane, leading to phagosomal maturation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".