Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une comparaison des pratiques de représentation des salariés dans des établissements de quatre pays européens montre quemalgré des différences institutionnelles importantes, des règles sociologiques communes fortes marquent les conditionsd’exercice de la représentation. L’accès des représentants à la légitimité mobilise des relations complexes où la base — lesmandants — et des regroupements externes plus larges — les syndicats — jouent chacun un rôle important. Alors que lescadres institutionnels semblent distinguer considérablement les pratiques, les règles sociologiques d’accès à la légitimité semblentau contraire unifier les représentants, qui sont les acteurs réels de la liaison entre les différents niveaux où se joue lareprésentation. La question de la centralisation ou de la décentralisation des négociations doit être lue à travers le prisme del’accès à la légitimité représentative plus qu’à travers celui de l’évolution des lieux formels de négociation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".