MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132735360 · doi:10.1306/07130909013

Allochthonous prodeltaic sediment facies in the Lower Cretaceous at the Tantallon M-41 well: Implications for the deep-water Scotian Basin

2010· article· en· W2132735360 on OpenAlexaff
David J. W. Piper, Ryan Noftall, Georgia Pe‐Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityConocoPhillips (Canada)Bedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousFaciesStructural basinSedimentPaleontologyDeep waterGeomorphologyGeochemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lower Cretaceous shelf-margin deltas in the Scotian Basin prograded across a deep outer-shelf platform and may have supplied sand to the deep-water Scotian margin. Conventional core from the Tantallon M-41 well was used to evaluate sediment facies and evidence for the transfer of deltaic sand to deep water. Two cores with shallow-water lithofacies show sediment deformation structures, resulting from surficial debris flow and deeper seated landsliding of deltaic sediment, interpreted by a comparison with modern sea-floor piston cores. Both mass-movement types produced a basal strongly foliated mudstone. Such allochthonous blocks create potential pitfalls in interpretation of paleowater depth from sedimentary structures in conventional core and microfossils in ditch cuttings. Autochthonous sediment on the deep outer-shelf platform is a distinctive red-brown mudstone with rare turbidite sandstone beds. The deepest core consists of thin-bedded sandstone turbidites showing Bouma Tb-c-d intervals and fading ripples characteristic of overbank settings, deposited on a high adjacent to 50–150-m (160–500-ft)-deep channels. These sandstones provide direct evidence that sand was transferred through channels into deep water in the Early Cretaceous. Sandy turbidity currents were sourced both by prodeltaic failure and transformation and by hyperpycnal flow from the mountainous rivers that supplied sediment to the Scotian Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207