MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132738933 · doi:10.1109/icma.2009.5246409

Fuzzy control of semi-active automotive suspensions

2009· article· en· W2132738933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive suspensionControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicSuspension (topology)Fuzzy control systemController (irrigation)Linear-quadratic regulatorControl engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive industryEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new fuzzy controller for semi-active vehicle suspension systems, which has a significantly fewer number of rules in comparison to existing fuzzy controllers. The proposed fuzzy controller has only nine fuzzy rules, whose performance is equivalent to the existing fuzzy controller with 49 fuzzy rules. The proposed controller with less number of fuzzy rules will be more feasible and cost-efficient in hardware implementation. For comparison, a linear quadratic regulator controlled semi-active suspension, and a passive suspension are also implemented and simulated. Simulation results show that the ride comfort and road holding are improved by 28% and 31%, respectively, with the fuzzy controlled semi-active suspension system, in comparison to the linear quadratic regulator controlled semi-active suspension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207