MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132754959 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.5.1177

TOURMALINE OF THE MRAMORNY TIN CLUSTER, CHUKOTKA PENINSULA, RUSSIA

2009· article· en· W2132754959 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
И. А. Бакшеев, П. Л. Тихомиров, V. O. Yapaskurt, М. Ф. Вигасина, V. Yu. Prokof’ev, V. I. Ustinov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Academy of SciencesLomonosov Moscow State University
KeywordsTourmalineTinGeologyPeninsulaGeochemistryCluster (spacecraft)ArchaeologyGeographyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porphyry-related deposits are the fourth type of tin deposits in importance after pegmatite, greisen and granite-related hydrothermal veins. We have studied tourmalines and associated minerals from the several porphyry-tin occurrences related to rhyolite dikes in the Mramorny tin cluster, located in Chukotka, the second large tin province in Russia after the Far East province. Two types of tourmaline were identified in the occurrences of the Mramorny tin cluster: (1) early pre-ore tourmaline, and (2) ore-stage tourmaline, which is associated with chamosite. The early-stage tourmaline can be classed as an intermediate member of the schorl–foitite and “oxy-schorl” – “oxy-foitite” series. Its compositions are characterized by their values of X -site vacancy and Fe tot /(Fe tot + Mg) ranging from 0.147 to 0.665 apfu and from 0.85 to 1.00, respectively. The ratio Fe 3+ /Fe tot in the tourmaline is about 19–25%. The ore-stage tourmaline is characterized by a more complex composition distinguished by lower values of X -site vacancy and Fe tot /(Fe tot + Mg), ranging from 0.018 to 0.437 apfu and from 0.49 to 0.75, respectively. The Fe 3+ /Fe tot value in the tourmaline is about 11–23%. The early and ore-stage tourmalines are characterized by different types of Al substitutions: AlO[R(OH)] −1 and □Al(RNa) −1 in the former, and FeAl −1 , taking into account the higher Mg concentration, in the latter. The precipitation of cassiterite and the higher activity of H 2 S during the ore stage resulted in the deposition of Fe-bearing sulfides, and the Fe tot /(Fe tot + Mg) value in the ore-stage tourmaline is lower than that of the early tourmaline. The pattern is similar in the associated early and ore-stage chamosite, i.e., the Fe tot /(Fe tot + Mg) ratio decreases like in tourmaline. On the basis of fluid inclusions, the ore-stage tourmaline started to crystallize at temperature about 385°C and at a pressure of 23 MPa. The fluid responsible for tourmaline formation and ore deposition did boil and was similar to that of porphyry-copper deposits, confirming that the occurrences studied are related to a porphyry environment. The oxygen isotopic data indicate a significant admixture of meteoric water at the ore-stage tourmaline deposition (δ 18 O H2O from −8.4 to +0.6‰). The comparison of the tourmalines studied here with tourmalines from porphyry-copper and porphyry-gold deposits indicates that the FeAl −1 substitution is typical of tourmaline in the porphyry environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207