MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2132768621 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0108

Kinetics and mechanism for chlorine-initiated atmospheric oxidation of ethyl formate

2014· article· en· W2132768621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yan Zhao, Xiaomin Sun, Wenxing Wang, Laixiang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReaction rate constantArrhenius equationIsomerizationDensity functional theoryEthyl formatePhysical chemistryChlorinePotential energy surfaceFormateComputational chemistryReaction mechanismDecompositionTransition state theoryTransition stateAtmospheric temperature rangeMethyl formateKineticsHydrogen atom abstractionActivation energyThermodynamicsMoleculeMethanolOrganic chemistryHydrogenCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chlorine-initiated reaction mechanism of ethyl formate in the atmosphere was investigated using the density functional theory method. The geometry parameters and frequencies of all of the stationary points were calculated at the B3LYP/ 6-31G(d,p) level. The single-point energy calculations were carried out at different levels, including MP2/6-31G(d), MP2/6-311++G(d,p), and CCSD(T)/6-31G(d). A detailed oxidation mechanism is provided and discussed. Present results show that α-ester rearrangement reaction and the O 2 direct abstraction from IM6 (HC(O)OCH(O)CH 3 ) are the more favorable pathway and are competitive. The 1,4-H shift isomerization of IM6 proved to be feasible under general atmospheric conditions. The decomposition of IM18 (CH 3 CH 2 OC(O)O) is favorable both thermodynamically and kinetically. Canonical variational transition theory with small-curvature tunneling correction was employed to predict the rate constants. The overall rate constant of ethyl formate at 298 K is 8.63 × 10 −12 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 . The Arrhenius equations of rate constants at the temperature range of 200–380 K were fitted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→