An Improved Guidance Image Based Method to Remove Rain and Snow in a Single Image
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rain and snow bring poor visibility at outdoor vision systems. The common used image processing methods may be not suitable for a degraded image. In this paper, a guidance image method is proposed to remove rain and snow in a single image. To removal rain and snow only using one image, a guidance image is derived from the imaging model of a raindrop or a snowflake when it is passing through an element on the CCD of the camera. Since only using this guidance image may lose some detailed information, in this paper, a refined guidance image is proposed. This refined guidance image has similar contour with the un-degraded image and also maintains the detailed information which may be lost at the guidance image. Then a removal procedure is given by the use of the refined guidance image. Some comparison results are made between different methods using the guidance image and the refined guidance image. The refined guidance image can be used to get a better removal result. Our results show that this proposed method has both good performance in rain removal and snow removal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it