MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132840088 · doi:10.1021/jo990976y

The First Lateral Functionalization of Calix[4]arenes by a Homologous Anionic Ortho-Fries Rearrangement

2000· article· en· W2132840088 on OpenAlexafffund
Oskar Middel, Zoltán Greff, Nick J. Taylor, Willem Verboom, David N. Reinhoudt, Victor Snieckus

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsChemistryFries rearrangementMoietyCarboxamideCalixareneMethyleneStereochemistryStereoselectivityMethylene bridgeCrystal structureSurface modificationCyclophaneMedicinal chemistryMoleculeCrystallographyCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment of calix[4]arene bis- O -carbamates 4a, b − 6a, b with LDA in THF results in the regio- and stereoselective introduction of both axial and equatorial carboxamide groups at the methylene bridges via a homologous anionic ortho-Fries rearrangement to give 7 − 16 . The stereochemical outcome of the rearrangement is dependent on the reaction conditions and the conformation of the starting material. Stereochemical and structural proof has been secured by the X-ray crystal structure of calix[4]arene 10 having only one equatorial carboxamide moiety. The use of this novel class of methylene bridge-functionalized calix[4]arenes is illustrated by the formation of bis-γ-lactone 19, while the enhanced acidity of the remaining hydroxyl groups, owing to the presence of axial carboxamide groups at the methine bridges, followed from the easy propylation of bisrearranged calix[4]arene 7 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207