MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132843310 · doi:10.1117/1.2750292

Impact of simulated light scatter on the quantitative, noninvasive assessment of retinal arteriolar hemodynamics

2007· article· en· W2132843310 on OpenAlex
Behrooz Azizi, Heike Buehler, Subha T. Venkataraman, Chris Hudson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsRetinalBlood flowLaserHemodynamicsLight intensityIntensity (physics)Materials scienceBiomedical engineeringMicrosphereMicrocirculationMedicineLens (geology)CorneaOpticsOphthalmologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We determine the impact of artificial light scatter on quantitative, noninvasive assessment of retinal arteriolar hemodynamics. One eye from each of 10 healthy young subjects between the ages of 18 and 30 (23.6+/-3.4) is randomly selected. To simulate light scatter, cells comprising a plastic collar and two plano lenses are filled with solutions of differing concentration of polystyrene microspheres (Polysciences Inc., USA). We prepare 0.002, 0.004, 0.006, and 0.008% microsphere concentrations as well as distilled water only. The Canon laser blood flowmeter (CLBF) is used to noninvasively assess retinal arteriolar blood flow. After a preliminary screening to confirm subject eligibility, seven arteriolar blood flow measurements are taken by randomly placing the cells between the instrument objective lens and the subjects' cornea. To achieve a baseline, subjects are first imaged with no cell in place. Both low- and high-intensity CLBF laser settings are assessed. Our light scatter model results in an artifactual increase of retinal arteriolar diameter (p<0.0001) and thereby increased retinal blood flow (p<0.0001). The 0.006 and 0.008% microsphere concentrations produce significantly higher diameter and flow values than baseline. Centerline blood velocity, however, is not affected by light scatter. Retinal arteriolar diameter values are significantly less with the high-intensity laser than with the low-intensity laser (p=0.0007). Densitometry assessment of vessel diameter is increasingly impacted as the magnitude of artificial light scatter increases; this effect can be partially negated by increasing laser intensity. A cataract is an inevitable consequence of aging and, therefore, care must be exercised in the interpretation of studies of retinal vessel diameter that use similar densitometry techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it