Short-term oral α-lipoic acid does not prevent lipid-induced dysregulation of glucose homeostasis in obese and overweight nondiabetic men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged elevation of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) induces insulin resistance and impairs pancreatic β-cell adaptation to insulin resistance. The mechanisms whereby lipid induces these impairments are not fully defined but may involve oxidative stress, inflammation, and endoplasmic reticulum stress. α-Lipoic acid (ALA), a commonly used health supplement with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and AMPK-activating properties, has been shown to have therapeutic value in type 2 diabetes and its complications. Here we examined the effects of ALA on insulin sensitivity and secretion in humans under the conditions of 24-h iv lipid infusion to elevate plasma FFAs. Eight overweight and obese male subjects underwent four randomized studies each, 4-6 wk apart: 1) SAL, 2-wk oral placebo followed by 24-h iv infusion of saline; 2) IH, 2-wk placebo followed by 24-h iv infusion of intralipid plus heparin to raise plasma FFAs approximately twofold; 3) IH + ALA, 2-wk ALA (1,800 mg/day) followed by 24-h infusion of intralipid plus heparin; and 4) ALA, 2-wk ALA followed by 24-h infusion of saline. Insulin secretion rates (ISR) and insulin sensitivity were assessed with a 2-h, 20-mmol/l hyperglycemic clamp and a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, respectively. ISR was not significantly different between treatments. Lipid infusion impaired insulin sensitivity with and without ALA pretreatment. These results indicate that ALA, administered orally at this dose for 2 wk, does not protect against lipid-induced insulin resistance in overweight and obese humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".