MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132887004 · doi:10.1109/stherm.2004.1291309

The creation of compact thermal models of electronic components using model reduction

2004· article· en· W2132887004 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoming Guo, D. Celo, P. Gunupudi, Roni Khazaka, D.J. Walkey, T. Smy, M. Nakhla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Boundary (topology)Independence (probability theory)MathematicsModel order reductionComputer scienceResistorTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmElectrical engineeringMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new approach to create boundary condition independent thermal compact models based on the multidimensional model reduction (MDMR) technique. A methodology is developed for the generation of a multi dimensional compact model (MDCM) from a detailed numerical model. The MDCM is shown to have a number of advantages over resistor network models. The generation of the model is at least an order of magnitude faster then the creation of an optimized network model. The MDCM displays very high accuracy typically better than 0.1%, is very flexible allowing for the prediction of all internal temperatures, and presents no limitations on the external configuration of the compact model. A generic multi-chip module ball grid array (MCMBGA) package is used to demonstrate the technique. The MDCM created shows to have high predictive capability, boundary condition independence and a small model size. Finally, by connecting the MDCM to a printed circuit board model and simulating the system, speed ups of around 100 times are achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207