MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lithospheric density variations and Moho structure of the Irish Atlantic continental margin from constrained 3-D gravity inversion

2010· article· en· W2132889325 on OpenAlexaff
J. Kim Welford, Patrick M. Shannon, B. M. O’Reilly, Jeremy Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGravity anomalyLithosphereRiftSeismologyContinental marginCrustBouguer anomalyBathymetryMantle (geology)Inversion (geology)Seafloor spreadingPassive marginTectonicsGeophysicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-D density anomaly model of the Irish Atlantic continental margin was generated from a regional inversion of the free air gravity data constrained by bathymetric and sediment thickness information. The model results are compared against a recent regional Moho structure compilation from velocity models from crustal-scale wide-angle reflection/refraction surveys. Using the inverted model, a regional map of Moho structure across the margin agrees well with the regional seismic compilation and also provides information in areas lacking deep seismic coverage. The density anomaly structure of the crust across the margin is investigated along model slices and using volume rendering of crustal layers. These views reveal extreme thinning,of the upper crust and a dominance of lower crustal densities in regions where exhumation of,serpentinized mantle has previously been interpreted. Using the regional view afforded by, the,inversion, the areal extent of these zones is tracked into regions lacking seismic constraints. Using the regional density anomaly model, variations in sediment thickness and crustal thickness are investigated to compute stretching factors across the margin and to identify zones,which deviate from local isostatic compensation. These zones generally correlate with faults,and rifting trends providing insights that could be useful for future palaeoreconstructions of North Atlantic rifting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207