MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132895275 · doi:10.2166/wqrjc.2011.112

Phosphorus removal by blast furnace slag and cement clinker – flow cell studies for estimation of sorptive capacity for use with constructed treatment wetlands

2011· article· en· W2132895275 on OpenAlexaff
Anamika Sikdar Paul, Bruce C. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround granulated blast-furnace slagPhosphorusSlag (welding)CementEnvironmental scienceSorptionWetlandClinker (cement)Constructed wetlandWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringSewage treatmentMetallurgyChemistryMaterials sciencePortland cementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blast furnace slag and cement clinker were explored in long-term flow cell experiments for estimation of their phosphorus (P) removal efficiencies. A local gravel, typically used in constructed treatment wetlands, was used as a control medium. The experiments examined the removal of phosphorus from a solution initially containing 4 mg P/L. The slag and clinker were nearly 100% efficient due to very high sorptive capacities. The control gravel medium removed 50% of the influent phosphorus. Results from this study indicate that the use of blast furnace slag in constructed wetlands or filter beds is a promising solution for P removal via sorption mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207