MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132909073 · doi:10.1002/polb.20441

Crystallization analysis fractionation

2005· article· en· W2132909073 on OpenAlexaff
João B. P. Soares, Siripon Anantawaraskul

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyolefinFractionationCrystallinityPolymer scienceCrystallizationCharacterization (materials science)PolymerMaterials sciencePolymerizationPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) is an analytical technique for determining the distribution of chain crystallizabilities of semicrystalline polymers. After only approximately a decade since it was developed, CRYSTAF has become one of the most important characterization techniques in polyolefin characterization laboratories because it provides fast and crucial information required for the proper understanding of polymerization mechanisms and structure–property relationships. In the polyolefin industry, it has been established as an indispensable tool for product development and product quality monitoring. This highlight article covers basic operation procedures, applications, and theoretical aspects of polymer fractionation with CRYSTAF. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 1557–1570, 2005

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207