MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132918441 · doi:10.1159/000086808

In utero Repair of an Experimental Neural Tube Defect in a Chronic Sheep Model Using Biomatrices

2005· article· en· W2132918441 on OpenAlexaff
A.J. Eggink, L.A.J. Roelofs, Wout Feitz, René Wijnen, R.A. Mullaart, J. A. Grotenhuis, Toin H. Van Kuppevelt, Martin Lammens, A.J. Crevels, Alex Hanssen, Paul P. van den Berg

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeural tubeMedicineIn uteroNeural tube defectFetusFetal surgerySpinal cordSpinal cord injuryNeurulationAmniotic fluidGestationSurgeryPregnancyEmbryoEmbryogenesisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Persistent exposure of the unprotected spinal cord to amniotic fluid and the uterine wall can lead to progressive damage of neural tissue in case of a myelomeningocele (two-hit hypothesis). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether in utero repair of an experimental neural tube defect in a fetal lamb could protect neural tissue from secondary injury and save neurologic functions after birth. METHODS: In 19 fetal lambs, a neural tube defect was created at 79 days' gestation. In 12 lambs the defect was covered either with a novel, molecular defined collagen-based biocompatible and biodegradable matrix (UMC) or with a small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biomatrix (Cook) or by closing the skin over the defect. RESULTS: All lambs with the defect covered showed no or minor neurologic morbidity in contrast to the lambs with the defect uncovered in which major neurologic morbidity was seen. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that long-term exposure of the open spinal cord to the intrauterine environment can lead to damage of neural tissue and, consequently loss of neurologic functions and that coverage of the defect can lead to a better neurologic outcome. Furthermore, we could show that a UMC biomatrix and an SIS biomatrix are useful for in utero coverage of a surgically created neural tube defect in our model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207