In utero Repair of an Experimental Neural Tube Defect in a Chronic Sheep Model Using Biomatrices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Persistent exposure of the unprotected spinal cord to amniotic fluid and the uterine wall can lead to progressive damage of neural tissue in case of a myelomeningocele (two-hit hypothesis). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether in utero repair of an experimental neural tube defect in a fetal lamb could protect neural tissue from secondary injury and save neurologic functions after birth. METHODS: In 19 fetal lambs, a neural tube defect was created at 79 days' gestation. In 12 lambs the defect was covered either with a novel, molecular defined collagen-based biocompatible and biodegradable matrix (UMC) or with a small intestinal submucosa (SIS) biomatrix (Cook) or by closing the skin over the defect. RESULTS: All lambs with the defect covered showed no or minor neurologic morbidity in contrast to the lambs with the defect uncovered in which major neurologic morbidity was seen. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that long-term exposure of the open spinal cord to the intrauterine environment can lead to damage of neural tissue and, consequently loss of neurologic functions and that coverage of the defect can lead to a better neurologic outcome. Furthermore, we could show that a UMC biomatrix and an SIS biomatrix are useful for in utero coverage of a surgically created neural tube defect in our model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it