MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132919298 · doi:10.1111/vec.12328

Retrospective evaluation of prognostic indicators in dogs with head trauma: 72 cases (January–March 2011)

2015· article· en· W2132919298 on OpenAlexaff
Diya Sharma, Marie K. Holowaychuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlasgow Coma ScaleActivated clotting timeHematocritCreatinineInjury Severity ScoreAnesthesiaRetrospective cohort studyIntubationBase excessHypertonic salineInternal medicineEmergency medicinePoison controlInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of clinical and laboratory variables and scoring systems in dogs with head trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective study (January-March, 2011). SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Seventy-two client-owned dogs with a history of head trauma occurring ≤5 days prior to hospital admission. Dogs were excluded if they had an unconfirmed history of trauma, preexisting neurologic disease, or insufficient data available in the medical record. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data from hospital admission were collected, including vital signs; blood pressure; pulse oximetry; venous blood gases and electrolyte concentrations; plasma lactate and blood glucose concentrations; PCV; total plasma protein concentration; activated clotting time; WBC count; and serum albumin, creatinine, total bilirubin, and BUN concentrations. Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MGCS), mentation, and animal trauma triage (ATT) scores were also calculated. Treatment with mannitol, hypertonic saline (HS), corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, or phenobarbital, and requirement for endotracheal intubation were also recorded. Outcome was classified as survival or nonsurvival to hospital discharge. Decreased pulse oximetry, pH, bicarbonate concentration, or base excess, and increased potassium concentration, lactate concentration, BUN concentration, ATT score, or mentation score were risk factors for nonsurvival. Decreased MGCS score was the strongest predictor of nonsurvival; a score ≤ 11 was 84% sensitive and 73% specific for predicting nonsurvival. Dogs were more likely to die before discharge if they required HS or endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Dogs that did not survive following head trauma were more likely to have poor perfusion, severe concurrent injuries reflected by increased ATT scores, severe traumatic brain injury as evidenced by decreased MGCS or increased mentation scores, or requirement for HS administration or endotracheal intubation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical CareSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207