Enhanced excitability of dissociated primary sensory neurons after chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion (CCD) produces ipsilateral cutaneous hyperalgesia and allodynia in rats. Intracellular electrophysiological recordings from formerly compressed neurons in the intact dorsal root ganglion (DRG) reveal lower than normal current thresholds (CTs) and abnormal spontaneous activity (SA) (Zhang JM, Song XJ, LaMotte RH. Enhanced excitability of sensory neurons in rats with cutaneous hyperalgesia produced by chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion. J Neurophysiol 1999;82:3359–66). To determine if the neuronal hyperexcitability is intrinsic to the soma, L4 and L5 DRG neurons from rats that had prior CCD surgery or those that did not (controls) were dissociated, and intracellular recordings obtained 3–8 h (acute) or 24–30 h (1d) after culture. The CTs of large- (>45 μm diameter) and medium- (30∼45 μm) sized neurons from control rats after acute or 1d culture were similar to those formerly recorded from the intact DRG and significantly lower for CCD than for control rats. However, the CTs of small- (≤30 μm) sized neurons from control rats were significantly lower in acute or 1d culture groups than they were in the intact DRG and not significantly different from those of dissociated small neurons from CCD rats. The overall incidence of SA was higher for CCD than for control neurons after 1d culture (10.3 vs. 1.8%) and similar to that obtained in the intact DRG. We conclude that the CCD-induced hyperexcitability of medium- and large-sized neurons remains after dissociation and is intrinsic to the soma. For small-sized neurons, the effects of CCD observed in the intact DRG are less apparent after dissociation possibly due to the hyperexcitability produced by the dissociation process itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".