MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132941873 · doi:10.1109/asap.1993.397147

Time-optimal visibility-related algorithms on meshes with multiple broadcasting

2002· article· en· W2132941873 on OpenAlexaff
D. Bhagavathi, V. Bokka, H. Gurla, Stephan Olariu, J.L. Schwing, Ivan Stojmenović, Jinming Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityBroadcasting (networking)AlgorithmComputer scienceDisjoint setsPlane (geometry)Polygon meshLine (geometry)MathematicsCombinatoricsComputer networkComputer graphics (images)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compaction step of integrated circuit design motivates the study of various visibility problems among vertical segments in the plane. One popular variant is referred to as the Vertical Segment Visibility problem (VSV, for short) and is stated as follows. Given a collection S of n disjoint vertical line segments in the plane, for every endpoint of a segment in S determine the first line segment, if any, interacted by a horizontal ray to the right (resp. left) originating from that endpoint. The contribution of this paper is to propose a time-optimal algorithm for the VSP problem on meshes with multiple broadcasting. The authors then use this algorithm to derive time-optimal solutions for two related problems. All the algorithms run in O(log n) time on a mesh with multiple broadcasting of size n /spl times/ n. This is the first instance of time-optimal solutions for these problems known to us.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207