Repartir à zéro loin de sa terre natale : la réinstallation des Lost Boys and Girls of Sudan au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les études sur les jeunes survivants de conflits armés et de violence politique viennent approfondir un domaine d’intérêt grandissant en criminologie. À cet égard, cet article met en lumière comment certains facteurs de protection ont pu favoriser la réinstallation au Canada d’une trentaine de « Lost Boys and Girls of Sudan », des jeunes réfugiés séparés de leurs familles en raison de la guerre au Sud-Soudan. L’analyse préliminaire d’entrevues individuelles et de groupes de discussion menés avec ces jeunes permet d’éclairer le rôle joué par des facteurs de protection qu’ils ont eux-mêmes cernés, notamment le désir de devenir de « bons citoyens », leur débrouillardise et leurs perspectives d’avenir, la culpabilité du survivant et le sentiment de responsabilité envers le pays d’origine, les familles de substitution et le capital affectif, le capital social et religieux ainsi que l’étiquette même de « Lost Boys and Girls ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".