MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132979415 · doi:10.1109/19.918119

A computer-controlled current-comparator-based four-terminal resistance bridge for power frequencies

2001· article· en· W2132979415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparatorOmegaElectrical engineeringVoltageCurrent (fluid)TransformerCurrent transformerElectronic circuitEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A current comparator technique is applied to four-terminal resistance measurements for obtaining a highly accurate AC resistance bridge at power frequencies of 50 to 60 Hz. Active circuits are used to establish equal voltage drops between the potential terminals of the two resistances being compared. The bridge is suitable for measuring resistances from 10 /spl mu//spl Omega/ to 100 k/spl Omega/. A cascading technique using two two-stage current transformers provides extension of the ratio range to 100000000 with a maximum applied current of 10000 A. The bridge features measurement with a resolution of one part in 10/sup 7/. The total combined uncertainty (2 /spl sigma/) of the bridge, including the range extenders at power frequencies, is estimated to be less than 5 /spl mu//spl Omega///spl Omega/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it