MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132994900 · doi:10.1109/wcre.2011.39

An Entropy Evaluation Approach for Triaging Field Crashes: A Case Study of Mozilla Firefox

2011· article· en· W2132994900 on OpenAlexaff
Foutse Khomh, Brian Chan, Ying Zou, Ahmed E. Hassan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrashTriageComputer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Computer securityMedicineOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A crash is an unexpected termination of an application during normal execution. Crash reports record stack traces and run-time information once a crash occurs. A group of similar crash reports represents a crash-type. The triaging of crash-types is critical to shorten the development and maintenance process. Crash triaging process decides the priority of crash-types to be fixed. The decision typically depends on many factors, such as the impact of the crash-type, (i.e, its severity), the frequency of occurring, and the effort required to implement a fix for the crash-type. In this paper, we propose the use of entropy region graphs to triage crash-types. An entropy region graph captures the distribution of the occurrences of crash-types among the users of a system. We conduct an empirical study on crash reports and bugs, collected from 10 beta releases of Fire fox 4. We show that our proposed triaging technique enables a better classification of crash-types than the current triaging used by Fire fox teams. Developers and managers could use such a technique to prioritize crash-types during triage, to estimate developer workloads, and to decide which crash-types patches should be included in a next release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207