MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133051795 · doi:10.1002/chem.200702027

<i>N</i>‐Tosyloxycarbamates as Reagents in Rhodium‐Catalyzed CH Amination Reactions

2008· article· en· W2133051795 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Huard, H. Lebel

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Catalytic Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAminationRhodiumNitreneChemistryIntramolecular forceCatalysisAmine gas treatingReagentCombinatorial chemistryIntermolecular forceTransition metalDimerAqueous solutionPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal nitrenes for use in C-H insertion reactions were obtained from N-tosyloxycarbamates in the presence of an inorganic base and a rhodium(II) dimer complex catalyst. The C-H amination reaction proceeds smoothly, and the potassium tosylate that forms as a byproduct is easily removed by filtration or an aqueous workup. This new methodology allows the amination of ethereal, benzylic, tertiary, secondary, and even primary C-H bonds. The intramolecular reaction provides an interesting route to various substituted oxazolidinones, whereas the intermolecular reaction gives trichloroethoxycarbonyl-protected amines that can be isolated with moderate to excellent yields and that cleave easily to produce the corresponding free amine. The development, scope, and limitations of the reactions are discussed herein. Isotopic effects and the electronic nature of the transition state are used to discuss the mechanism of the reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations178
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicSynthesis and Catalytic ReactionsFrench-language works237,207