Vector quantization using spectral index-based multiple subcodebooks for hyperspectral data compression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a spectral index (SI)-based multiple subcodebook algorithm (MSCA) for lossy hyperspectral data compression. The scene of a hyperspectral dataset to be compressed is delimited into n regions by segmenting its SI image. The spectra in each region have similar spectral characteristics. The dataset is then separated into n subsets, corresponding to the n regions. While keeping the total number of codevectors the same (i.e. the same compression ratio), not just a single codebook, but n smaller and more efficient subcodebooks are generated. Each subcodebook is used to compress the spectra in the corresponding region. With the MSCA, both the codebook generation time (CGT) and coding time (CT) can be improved by a factor of around n at almost no loss of fidelity. Four segmentation methods for delimiting the scene of the data cube were studied. Three hyperspectral vector quantization data compression systems that use the improved techniques were simulated and tested. The simulation results show that the CGT could be reduced by more than three orders of magnitude, while the quality of the codebooks remained good. The overall processing speed of the compression systems could be improved by a factor of around 1000 at an average fidelity penalty of 1.0 dB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".