MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133084356 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd:20060309

Sequential phase energisation technique for capacitor switching transient reduction

2007· article· en· W2133084356 on OpenAlex
S.G. Abdulsalam, Wilsun Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorTransient (computer programming)Electrical impedanceDecoupling capacitorVoltageSwitched capacitorCircuit breakerReduction (mathematics)OvervoltageReservoir capacitorComputer scienceElectrical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of a sequential switching scheme for the mitigation of capacitor switching transients is presented. The method utilises neutral grounding impedance connected at the neutral point of the switched capacitor bank together with sequential pole switching. The neutral impedance is sized to minimise the open-circuit contact voltage of the capacitor breaker phases. Theoretical analysis of the proposed scheme has been carried out together with computer simulation. In addition, neutral impedance sizing criteria are presented in order to achieve minimal transient over-voltage caused by capacitor switching. The proposed method was found capable of reducing the transient over-voltage at the utility switched capacitor location to 1.07 and 1.12 p.u. at the customer load bus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it