MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133110788 · doi:10.1017/s002187581000099x

Claire Greslé-Favier, “Raising Sexually Pure Kids”: Sexual Abstinence, Conservative Christians and American Politics (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi Press, 2009, $93.00). Pp. vii+276. <scp>isbn</scp>978 90 420 2678 0.

2010· article· en· W2133110788 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Rak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstinenceSexual abstinenceRaising (metalworking)PoliticsSociologyReligious studiesPolitical scienceDemographyPhilosophyLawEngineeringPopulationFamily planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Claire Greslé-Favier, “Raising Sexually Pure Kids”: Sexual Abstinence, Conservative Christians and American Politics (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi Press, 2009, $93.00). Pp. vii+276. isbn978 90 420 2678 0. - Volume 44 Issue 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207