MétaCan
Menu
← all works

Cohesive and non‐cohesive fracture by higher‐order enrichment of XFEM

2012· article· en· 54 citations· W2133148016 on OpenAlex· 10.1002/nme.3329

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
Genre
Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score
0.269
Threshold uncertainty score
1.000
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread
0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

SUMMARY A comprehensive study is performed on the use of higher‐order terms of the crack tip asymptotic fields as enriching functions for the eXtended FEM (XFEM) for both cohesive and traction‐free cracks. For traction‐free cracks, the Williams asymptotic field is used to obtain highly accurate stress intensity factors (SIFs), directly from the enriched degrees of freedom without any post‐processing. The low accuracy of the results of the original research on this subject by Liu et al. [ Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng ., 2004; 59:1103–1118] is remedied here by appropriate modifications of the enrichment scheme. The modifications are simple and can be easily included into an XFEM computer code. For cohesive cracks, the relevant asymptotic field is used, and two widely used criteria including the SIFs criterion and the stress criterion are examined for the crack growth simulation. Both linear and nonlinear cohesive laws are used. For the stress criterion, averaging is avoided due to the highly accurate crack tip approximation because of the higher‐order enrichment. Then, a modified stress criterion is proposed, which is shown to be applicable to a wider class of problems. Several numerical examples, including straight and curved cracks, stationary and growing cracks, single and multiple cracks, and traction‐free and cohesive cracks, are studied to investigate in detail the robustness and efficiency of the proposed enrichment scheme. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Topic
Numerical methods in engineering
Field
Engineering
Canadian institutions
University of Waterloo
Funders
not available
Keywords
Stress fieldTraction (geology)Extended finite element methodRobustness (evolution)Finite element methodNonlinear systemStress (linguistics)Stress intensity factorStructural engineeringCohesive zone modelMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes