Retour au centre à Québec : la renaissance de La Cité est-elle durable ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les quartiers centraux de Québec qui forment l’arrondissement de La Cité ont connu, après plusieurs décennies de pertes, un regain démographique appréciable entre 1996 et 2001. Le texte explore les tenants et aboutissants de cette renaissance : arrivée plus forte de jeunes adultes que de personnes âgées, croissance de l’emploi local dans les nouveaux secteurs de l’économie, revalorisation chez certains du genre de vie urbain et politiques publiques municipales favorables. Jusqu’ici, cette renaissance n’est pas associée à une forte gentrification. Elle n’est pas non plus unique à Québec car elle participe à une résurgence urbaine d’échelle mondiale. Pour toutes ces raisons, on pourrait penser que la renaissance de La Cité sera durable, c’est-à-dire qu’elle se maintiendra tout en mettant de l’avant des pratiques de développement urbain durable. Cependant, elle est encore trop récente pour que nous soyons catégoriques à cet égard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".