Les facteurs contributifs au leadership du Greffier dans la fonction publique du Canada<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire: Le titre de Greffier du Conseil privé s'accompagne maintenant d'aurres titres et responsabilités. Plusieurs personnalités différentes ont rempli ces responsabilités. Le leadership du Greffier s'exerce sur une variété de personnages politiques et administratifs de premier plan et dans des circonstances souvent paradoxales: il faut savoir implanter les changements tout en protégeant les conventions constitutionnelles. Cet article veut démontrer que la pratique de ce leadership ne peut être ramenée à la seule maîtrise des techniques relationnelles fournies par l'évolution des approches en leadership. Celles‐ci ne sont pas muruellement exclusives mais se complètent. Le dosage des approches dépend d'abord de l'évolution de la fonction et de ses défis, ce qui renvoie à l'approche des compétences. Enfin, l'article montrera que trois autres facteurs ont influencé la.pratique du leadership: le style de gestion du titulaire, sa reputation et le contexte specifique de l'exercice du leadership (soit la dualité des fonctions, les titulaires au sommet et la concurrence des autres acteurs politiques: chef de cabinet, autres ministres et conseillers spéciaux). L'article comporte quatre parties: le concept de leadership appliqué au secteur public; l'évolution du Bureau du Conseil privé et des fonctions du Greffier; les fondements et instruments du leadership et les facteurs de contexte; et la performance en matière de leadership. Abstract: The title of clerk of the Privy Council now includes several other roles and responsibilities. These responsibilities are fulfilled by several different individuals. Included within the clerk's leadership, sometimes in circumstances that are paradoxical, are a variety of leading political and administrative figures; it is, therefore, essential for the clerk to implement the needed changes while also protecting the conventions of the Constitution. This article seeks to demonstrate that the practice of this type of leadership goes beyond the simple mastery of relational techniques provided by the evolution of leadership approaches. These are complementary rather than mutually exclusive. The particular blend of leadership approaches depends first on the evolution of duty and its challenges, which relates back to the skills approach. Finally, the article will demonstrate that three other factors influence the practice of leadership: the management style of the incumbent; his or her reputation; and the specific context in which the leadership is practised (i.e., the duality of functions and incumbents at the highest level and the competition from the other political actors—chief of staff, other ministers and special advisers). The article has four parts: the concept of leadership as applied to the public sector; the evolution of the PCO and the duties of the clerk; the fundamentals and instruments of leadership and the contextual factors; and the performance of leadership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".