Partis politiques et divisions sociales : les enseignements de l’Europe centrale et orientale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les mutations intervenues depuis 1990 dans les pays d’Europe centrale et orientale appellent une redéfinition des rapports établis entre partis politiques et divisions sociales. Aucune concordance n’est pourtant perceptible au premier abord. Selon l’explication la plus répandue, les pesanteurs héritées du régime communiste font obstacle à une connexion des dynamiques politique et sociale. Cette clé de lecture ne fonctionne que dans la mesure où une attention exclusive est accordée aux facteurs de structuration internes. Elle perd toute pertinence dès l’instant où sont prises en compte les contraintes externes imposées par le processus d’élargissement de l’Union européenne. Les partis politiques d’Europe centrale et orientale doivent se positionner face aux exigences de la Commission. Il leur faut par ailleurs relayer les intérêts que ces mêmes exigences confortent ou contrarient au sein de la population. La nécessité d’articuler les sollicitations externes et internes préside à une connexion indirecte des dynamiques politique et sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".