MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133239928 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2007.378831

Towards Automated Power Gating of Registers using CoDeL

2007· article· en· W2133239928 on OpenAlexaff
Nainesh Agarwal, N.J. Dimopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGatingPower gatingClock gatingEmbedded systemPower (physics)CompilerComputer hardwareVoltageEngineeringOperating systemClock skewTransistorJitterTelecommunicationsMedicineClock signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we use the CoDeL platform to develop test circuits and analyze the potential and performance impact of power gating individual registers. For each register, we examine the percentage of clock cycles for which they can be powered off, and the loss of performance incurred as a result of waiting for the power to be restored. Using a time-based technique to determine when the registers can be turned off results in 15% bit cycles saved at a performance loss of 2%. We then propose a method, which uses the information available to the CoDeL compiler to predict when the components can be powered off. Results show that our CoDeL assisted gating scheme allows up to 58% more power gated bit cycles than the time-based technique, with similar performance loss

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207