MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133272479 · doi:10.1109/taes.2012.6324671

Integration of a Triaxial Magnetometer into a Helicopter UAV GPS-Aided INS

2012· article· en· W2133272479 on OpenAlexaffabout
Martin Barczyk, Alan F. Lynch

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
KeywordsObservabilityHeading (navigation)Global Positioning SystemExtended Kalman filterInertial navigation systemKalman filterMagnetometerCompassInertial measurement unitComputer scienceGPS/INSControl theory (sociology)EngineeringInertial frame of referenceAerospace engineeringAssisted GPSComputer visionArtificial intelligenceGeographyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The University of Alberta's Applied Nonlinear Controls Lab (ANCL) helicopter unmanned aerial vehicle's (UAV's) existing GPS-aided inertial navigation system (INS) does not provide observability of heading angle during hover. This motivates the integration of a triaxial magnetometer aiding sensor into the extended Kalman filter (EKF)-based navigation algorithm. A novel magnetometer calibration procedure is implemented and compared with conventional approaches. Experimental results in ground and flight testing confirm that the observability issue is resolved and demonstrate improvements in attitude estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207