MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133299498 · doi:10.1139/e08-057

Taphonomy and ontogeny of a multibranched Ediacaran fossil: <i>Bradgatia</i> from the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland

2008· article· en· W2133299498 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lija I. Flude, Guy M. Narbonne

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetalOntogenyPaleontologyTaphonomyGeologyBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rangeomorphs, an extinct group of Ediacaran organisms with a fractal architecture and modular construction, occur abundantly in the Mistaken Point assemblage (575–560 Ma) of the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland. Bradgatia is represented by hundreds of specimens, collectively permitting analysis of its morphology, growth mode, and life habits. Bradgatia is a petalage that consists of a radial array of up to eight petals, each exhibiting up to four visible orders of rangeomorph branching. The taphonomy and ontogeny of Bradgatia are tightly linked by a change in preserved morphology, from juvenile I- to V-shaped specimens to larger U-shaped specimens, to the largest and ontogenetically oldest O-shaped specimens. Bradgatia probably maintained a constant number of petals that gradually spread out with age. The number of frondlets per petal does not correlate with length, suggesting either fractal or inflationary growth. Presence of a structure from which petals branch, abundance of contour-parallel specimens, differential preservation within specimens, and specimens overlying spindles and discs all imply that Bradgatia had an attached, epifaunal, suspension-feeding lifestyle. Bradgatia's multiple thin petals would have helped to filter water more efficiently, while its lack of a stem would have allowed for suspension feeding along the entire length of each petal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207