MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133330330 · doi:10.1021/bi050646+

Assembly of Tubulin by Classic Myelin Basic Protein Isoforms and Regulation by Post-Translational Modification

2005· article· en· W2133330330 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher M. Hill, David S. Libich, George Harauz

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTubulinGene isoformMyelin basic proteinMicrotubuleCitrullinationDeamidationRecombinant DNABiochemistryBiologyCell biologyTropomyosinMicrotubule-associated proteinMutantChemistryMolecular biologyMyelinActinEnzymeAmino acidGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myelin basic protein (MBP), a highly cationic protein that maintains the structure of the myelin sheath, associates with tubulin in vivo. The in vitro assembly of tubulin by MBP was examined here using several assays. The unmodified C1 component of 18.5 kDa bovine MBP (bC1) assembled tubulin into microtubules in a dose-dependent manner via filamentous intermediates, and was able simultaneously to promote the formation of microtubule bundles. The critical tubulin concentration in the presence of bC1 was 0.69 +/- 0.05 microM. The effects of post-translational modifications (such as deamidation and phosphorylation) were assayed by comparing the bC1-bC6 components of 18.5 kDa bovine MBP; an increasing level of modification enhanced the ability of MBP to assemble tubulin. The effects of charge reduction via deimination were examined using recombinant murine isoforms emulating the unmodified C1 and deiminated C8 isoforms of 18.5 kDa MBP; both rmC1 and rmC8 exhibited a comparable ability to assemble tubulin. The effects of alternate exon recombination of the classic MBP variants were tested using the recombinant murine 21.5, 17.22, and 14 kDa isoforms. The isoforms containing regions derived from exon II of the classic MBP gene, 21.5 and 17.22 kDa MBP, showed no substantial difference in the extent of tubulin polymerization and bundling when compared to those of 18.5 kDa MBP. The 14 kDa isoform and two terminal deletion mutants of rmC1 were able to induce microtubule polymerization, but not bundling, to the same degree as the longer proteins. Finally, bC1 was shown to disrupt and aggregate planar sheets of crystalline tubulin stabilized by paclitaxel, establishing that these structures are not suitable substrates for the formation of MBP cocrystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207