Regular solution model for asphaltene precipitation from bitumens and solvents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A regular solution theory liquid‐liquid equilibrium model was developed to predict asphaltene precipitation from Western Canadian bitumens. The input parameters for the model are the mole fraction, molar volume, and solubility parameters for each component. Bitumens were divided into four main pseudo‐components corresponding to SARA fractions: saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes. Asphaltenes were divided into fractions of different associated molar mass based on a Schultz‐Zimm molar mass distribution. Asphaltene self‐association was accounted for through the average molar mass of the distribution. The molar volumes and solubility parameters of the pseudo‐components were calculated using solubility, density, and molar mass measurements. The model successfully predicted the effect of solvent type and associated molar mass on asphaltene precipitation for model oil and n‐alkane systems. The model also predicted the onset and amount of asphaltene precipitation from bitumens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it