MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133365193 · doi:10.7202/004692ar

Le meilleur professeur est un éternel étudiant. Bengt Hambraeus, compositeur et pédagogue

2002· article· fr· W2133365193 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Laurie Radford

Bibliographic record

VenueCircuit Musiques contemporaines · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un ancien étudiant du compositeur d’origine suédoise Bengt Hambraeus dresse un portrait chaleureux de ce dernier. Il passe en revue les principales étapes de sa formation d’organiste, de musicologue et de compositeur et il souligne sa participation active à la vie musicale suédoise en qualité de producteur à la radio d’État. L’auteur explique ensuite les motifs qui ont conduit Hambraeus à émigrer au Canada en 1972. Débute alors sa fructueuse carrière de pédagogue à la Faculté de musique de l’université McGill, à Montréal. Il y assure, avec son collègue alcides lanza, la direction du studio de musique électroacoustique. Il y enseigne également la composition et propose différents cours et séminaires sur l’écriture et la musique d’avant-garde. Sa vaste expérience de musicien professionnel, sa curiosité insatiable, sa mémoire prodigieuse et sa capacité d’établir, à partir d’un sujet donné, des liens multiples avec différentes disciplines et époques de l’histoire de la musique sont particulièrement mis en valeur. Ces traits de caractère permettent de mieux comprendre les compositions de celui que ses élèves surnomment « l’encyclopédie vivante ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCircuit Musiques contemporainesSame topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207