MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133410794 · doi:10.3917/polaf.114.0105

La force européenne au Tchad et en Centrafrique : le baptême du feu

2009· article· fr· W2133410794 on OpenAlex
Frédéric Mérand, Haingo Mireille Rakotonirina

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitique africaine · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUnited Nations
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’Union européenne peut-elle être un acteur stratégique et neutre en Afrique subsaharienne ? L’Eufor Tchad/RCA est l’opération militaire la plus difficile engagée par l’UE depuis le lancement de sa Politique européenne de sécurité et de défense (Pesd), en 1998. Dressant un bilan de cette opération officiellement bouclée en mars 2009, cet article vise à éclairer les principaux enjeux auxquels l’Eufor a été confrontée. Après avoir esquissé le contexte de l’intervention, il analyse les conditions ayant amené l’UE à déployer cette force, son fonctionnement, le débat entre les États membres sur la pertinence d’une telle mission, et plus généralement sur les liens entre l’Eufor et le développement de la Pesd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it