Botulinum A Toxin (BOTOX) in the Lower Eyelid: Dose-Finding Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A, BOTOX) is an excellent therapeutic option for hyperkinetic facial lines. It improves wrinkles by relaxing the muscles of facial expression, which underlie the rhytids. Periocular wrinkles such as lateral orbital rhytids respond well to treatment. BOTOX can be used in the lower eyelid to improve wrinkles and widen the eye. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is additional benefit in using more than 2 U of BTX-A to improve infraorbital wrinkles and widen the eye. METHODS: Nineteen women had BTX-A injected into the orbicularis oculi muscle. Eleven women had 4 U injected into the lower eyelid bilaterally, 3 mm below the ciliary margin, and 12 U of BTX-A injected into one lateral orbital (crow's feet) area. Eight patients had 8 U injected bilaterally into the lower eyelid and 12 U placed unilaterally into the crow's feet. Physicians and patients independently evaluated the degree of improvement (grade 3=dramatic improvement, grade 2=moderate improvement, grade 1=mild improvement, and grade 0=no improvement). Single investigator analysis was used to measure, in actual millimeters, the amount of increase in palpebral aperture. Side effects were noted. RESULTS: Improvement was noted in lower eyelid wrinkles by both physicians and patients at both dose groups. When only the lower lid was injected, patients reported an improvement of 1.18 with 4 U and a grade of 1.63 with 8 U. When both the lower eyelid the lateral orbital area were treated, an improvement of 1.73 was reported with 4 U and a grade of 2.25 reported with 8 U in the lower eyelid. Physician evaluations had grades of 1.85 for 4 U alone and 1.85 with 8 U alone. Grades of 2.35 and 2.25 were obtained for 4 U plus 12 U and 8 U plus 12 U, respectively. An increase in palpebral aperture (IPA) occurred in all subjects. Subjects who received 4 U in the lower eyelid alone had a 1.8-mm IPA at rest and a 2.6-mm increase at full smile. Subjects who received 8 U of BTX-A alone in the lower lid had an IPA of 2.2 mm at rest and 2.9 mm at full smile. Eyes treated with 12 U in the bilateral orbital area plus 4 U in the lower eyelid had an IPA of 2.2 at rest and 4.5 mm at full smile. Those treated with 8 U in the lower lid plus the crow's feet had an IPA of 1.5 at rest and 4.0 at full smile. Side effects increased with dosage, with eight of eight subjects in the 8-U dose groups reporting bothersome side effects such as lower eyelid edema and incomplete sphincter function. CONCLUSION: A dose-response curve is seen with increasing doses of BTX-A used in the lower eyelid. Treatment of the lateral orbital area in combination with the lower lid produces a synergistic response at lower doses, but at higher doses, a plateau effect is suggested. Although increasing doses of BTX-A increases eye widening, unattractive results and side effects are seen at higher doses. The authors recommend that lower 2- or 4-U doses of BTX-A be used in the lower eyelid and specifically discuss techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".