MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133452493 · doi:10.1109/pac.2001.986535

RF control systems for the TRIUMF ISAC RF structures

2002· article· en· W2133452493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRangingRadio frequencyAmplitudePhysicsDrift tubePhase (matter)Radio-frequency quadrupoleQuadrupoleParticle acceleratorControl systemElectrical engineeringOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsBeam (structure)Atomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ISAC RF system consists of a radio frequency quadrupole accelerator, five drift tube LINACs, six bunchers, two choppers, and a bunch rotator. An additional buncher will be added in the near future. They run at frequencies ranging from 5.89 to 106.08 MHz, and have cavity Q values ranging from 400 to in excess of 5000. All have to run synchronously and be individually amplitude and phase regulated. A novel system that provides closed-loop amplitude, phase, and tuning control for each cavity using a single feedback circuit is employed. This system, as well as the frequency synthesis and distribution system, is described in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it