Restoring AS160 phosphorylation rescues skeletal muscle insulin resistance and fatty acid oxidation while not reducing intramuscular lipids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined whether AICAR or leptin rapidly rescued skeletal muscle insulin resistance via increased palmitate oxidation, reductions in intramuscular lipids, and/or restoration of insulin-stimulated AS60 phosphorylation. Incubation with palmitate (2 mM, 0-18 h) induced insulin resistance in soleus muscle. From 12-18 h, palmitate was removed or AICAR or leptin was provided while 2 mM palmitate was maintained. Palmitate oxidation, intramuscular triacylglycerol, diacylglycerol, ceramide, AMPK phosphorylation, basal and insulin-stimulated glucose transport, plasmalemmal GLUT4, and Akt and AS160 phosphorylation were examined at 0, 6, 12, and 18 h. Palmitate treatment (12 h) increased intramuscular lipids (triacylglycerol +54%, diacylglycerol +11%, total ceramide +18%, C16:0 ceramide +60%) and AMPK phosphorylation (+118%), whereas it reduced fatty acid oxidation (-60%) and insulin-stimulated glucose transport (-70%), GLUT4 translocation (-50%), and AS160 phosphorylation (-40%). Palmitate removal did not rescue insulin resistance or associated parameters. The AICAR and leptin treatments did not consistently reduce intramuscular lipids, but they did rescue palmitate oxidation and insulin-stimulated glucose transport, GLUT4 translocation, and AS160 phosphorylation. Increased AMPK phosphorylation was associated with these improvements only when AICAR and leptin were present. Hence, across all experiments, AMPK phosphorylation did not correlate with any parameters. In contrast, palmitate oxidation and insulin-stimulated AS160 phosphorylation were highly correlated (r = 0.83). We speculate that AICAR and leptin activate both of these processes concomitantly, involving activation of unknown kinases in addition to AMPK. In conclusion, despite the maintenance of high concentrations of palmitate (2 mM), as well as increased concentrations of intramuscular lipids (triacylglycerol, diacylglycerol, and ceramide), the rapid AICAR- and leptin-mediated rescue of palmitate-induced insulin resistance is attributable to the restoration of insulin-stimulated AS160 phosphorylation and GLUT4 translocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".