MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133467905 · doi:10.1109/tdcllm.2000.882795

Preliminary results on the development of a teleoperated compact trolley for live-line working

2002· article· en· W2133467905 on OpenAlexaffabout
Serge Montambault, J. Allan Cote, M. St. Louis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationOverhead (engineering)Overhead lineElectrical conductorComputer scienceLine (geometry)Development (topology)Electrical engineeringSimulationEmbedded systemEngineeringRobotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new teleoperated trolley for live-line operations in under development at Hydro-Quebec's Research Institute (IREQ). This very compact and lightweight trolley is part of the development of an innovative method for de-icing conductors and overhead ground wires. Many live-line applications have since been identified. Indeed, the second phase of the development of a teleoperated device for cleaning live-line conductors in South America should begin at the end of the year. A prototype of a live-line inspection vehicle with a remotely operated camera and other instruments also uses the trolley as its mobile platform. Another application for the trolley is the replacement of overhead ground wire with OPGW (or simply with a new ground wire), using the cradle block stringing method, which method needs a high traction force trolley. The design of the trolley uses state-of-the-art technologies, resulting in a very performing device that enables the development of new live-line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207